This is a nice gesture, but their sole Verizon Windows Phone is completely uninspired in terms of hardware looks, speed, and features.  The UI does seem innovative, but you need some flashy hardware to get someone like me to give up Android (or iOS) to take a chance. A few apps won’t cut it.

Microsoft giving $25 in apps to Windows Phone buyers – latimes.com.

I’d love it if the “new direction” includes better recommendation / playlist generation tools for both web and mobile clients, but it’s more likely it’ll be something less interesting like selling MP3s directly through them.  But, you never know.

Spotify Unveiling ‘New Direction’ on Nov. 30 | News & Opinion | PCMag.com.

Posted by: Eddie | November 20, 2011

Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet: An owner’s comparison

I’m a gadget nut, and have bought both a Kindle Fire (KF) and Nook Tablet (NT) after receiving spousal approval. (He’s angling for a Macbook Air upgrade in the near future, so letting me get a couple cheap tablets paves the way for my approving that…). I’m quite happy with both of them, and think either one is more capable than many reviewers are giving them credit for.  (I also own an iPad 2, so am familiar with the “gold standard” of tablets.)  I think either one can be a great choice for someone looking for a capable tablet/e-reader on a budget.  I’m really liking the 7″ form factor and may be using one or both of these more than the iPad 2 simply because either is so much easier to hold for long periods, and the smaller screen bothers me less than I initially thought it would.

Significant differences

There are already several articles comparing and contrasting these two devices, and I’m not going to do the usual spec and storage compare/contrast they’ve all beaten to death. Rather, I’d like to discuss some significant differences I’ve seen that other reviewers either don’t mention at all, or don’t go into enough detail.

Do you like your screens warm or cool?

Some reviewers preferred the NT screen, others found them fairly equivalent. What no one mentions is that the NT has a much “warmer” screen than the KF. If you have a newer TV then it probably has color settings that let you pick a warmer or cooler look to it.  A warmer display has more of a yellowish tint to it, and a cooler display has a bluish tint. When placing the two side-by-side the difference is very noticeable.  Whites on the NT look much more like an off-white in comparison to the brighter/bluish white of the KF.

In most situations I prefer the NT screen’s warmer tones (and darker blacks), but anyone with a preference for a cooler palette would definitely prefer the KF.

Do you like your fonts anti-aliased?

Most reviewers say the NT has sharper text when reading books, and that is definitely true. BUT, I find myself preferring the fonts on the KF. It’s clear when comparing them side-by-side that the KF is applying heavier anti-aliasing to its fonts, which leads to the slightly “fuzzier” look to the letters, but it also makes the type look smoother and in my eyes more pleasant to look at. Yes the letters on the NT are sharper, but there’s also a little bit of “lumpiness” to them that I find unattractive.  Some fonts are better/worse than others, but initially I like the KF fonts more.

I’m not sure which will be easier on the eyes over the long-haul, but I was surprised to find myself preferring the smoother KF fonts over the sharper but less attractive NT ones.  Having said that, this is clearly a personal preference, so if you want razor sharp text then the NT is definitely the better choice for you.

While on the subject of readability, I like to choose a sepia-colored background while reading books to keep things easier on my eyes (along with lowered brightness). Here too I prefer the KF’s choice of color. It has a much more muted and soft yellow background, whereas the “sepia” setting on the NT is really really YELLOW. I find myself using the ”butter” setting, which is a slightly off-white. The KF’s yellow background is halfway between the “sepia” and “butter” choices on the NT, which for me is the sweet spot.

On the other hand, I like the UI for the NT when it comes to reading books. It’s obviously more mature than the KF’s, and to my eyes more elegant and polished. The “Nook Friends” social stuff is a pleasant touch, but unfortunately my other friends that are on it haven’t done much in a year or so with it, so I don’t know how much I’ll be using it.

Overall I find both tablets to be very capable book readers.  I’m not much for magazine and newspaper reading on either device, but from my initial playing around I’d agree with the general reviewer consensus that while the KF is ok, the NT is more capable in both these areas.

The tortoise and the hare

Ok, the difference in browser speeds isn’t QUITE that extreme, but I was shocked at how much faster the NT’s web browser was than the KF’s. I kept the KF set to ‘Accelerated browsing’, and set both to prefer desktop over mobile versions for pages.

The KF is more than acceptable to me, but in side-by-side testing on more complicated sites (cnn.com, msnbc.com, nytimes.com, imdb.com, etc.) the NT almost always finished sooner.  The typical difference was a second or two, but sometimes it was several seconds.  Amusingly, the NT even rendered amazon.com quicker than the KF did!  Out of about 30 sites there were only 2 that the KF rendered faster.

One other notable difference: other than a narrow bar at the bottom, the NT browser devotes the whole display to the web page, whereas the KF kept a thicker bar at the bottom as well as a bar at the top. BUT, that top bar is for tabbed browsing, which I *really* like, and the bottom bar kept the home screen, back button, browser settings, and bookmarks a single touch away, which I also greatly appreciated.

Overall I prefer the KF browser’s layout that sacrifices a bit of page space for tabbed browsing and ease of access to other navigational controls, but the NT’s speed advantage is significant. Also, I found the warm/cool color tones very noticeable on web pages that normally have lots of white in them, with the NT display more pleasant.

An app a day keeps the doctor away?

When considering price differential, Amazon’s “free app of the day” is not discussed enough. These are applications that normally cost money, but are offered free for one day.  (Not just to be used for one day, they’re yours to keep as a full purchase!)  They sometimes have wonderful apps available, and I love checking this each day.

Recently they had the descriptively named “Enhanced E-mail” application, which has some nice enhancements over the stock e-mail application, as well as QuickOffice and Autodesk’s Sketchbook. In other words, it’s not just a bunch of cheesy games, they’re giving away some significant apps!

On the NT side, the app selection is much smaller, however the apps I’ve used so far all seem much more custom crafted for the NT, and sometimes take better advantage of the hardware.  In both cases we have a “walled garden” of apps, with Amazon taking a more liberal approach that allows in a bit more in the way of junk, but provides a better selection, and B&N that is much stricter, but provides greater confidence that an app will work well if you do get it.

The free apps I’m getting through the Amazon store will ultimately give me more good apps on my KF at no cost, and that tips the scale for me in preferring Amazon’s approach.

Bottom’s up, or, the merits of being flexible

One thing many KF reviewers complain about is the positioning of its power button and headphone jack on the bottom, and how it leads to accidental presses on occasion. But, one of the strengths of the KF is that it is more than willing to orient its UI any way you like: landscape or portrait, with either direction being up.  All you have to do is rotate the KF so the power button is on the top, and the UI happily adjusts and problem solved!  (Apps I’ve used so far adapt as well.)

On the other hand the NT’s UI stubbornly insists on using it in the one orientation.  The web browser, book reader, and most apps are flexible enough to change as you rotate the NT, I just wish its main UI screens would as well.

In terms of what you can do with the main UI itself, the KF has a very fixed way of doing things, with a carousel showing your content ordered by when last accessed (mixing together books, apps, last viewed web page, music, videos, etc.) and shelves of favorites (4 per shelf, that you get to choose) below. While you can re-order your favorites, new ones are always added at the start of the top shelf.

At first I was dubious about this very rigid approach, and wanted a more traditional arrangeable screen, I found that it was surprisingly efficient, with the slickly-quick carousel acting as quick access to recently accessed items, and the shelves for my favorites. Top menu options for Newstand, Books, Music, Video, Docs, Apps, and Web let you quickly get to content by category, but you don’t have many sorting options *within* those categories. But, if you’re looking for a specific item on your device the always-present Search box at the top works very well, searching across all categories of content.

The NT has a more traditional UI, with multiple screens you can design by drag-and-drop. But, in order to search content you first have to select the category (Books, Apps, etc.) and then within that section you are presented with a search box.

Overall the NT’s UI is definitely more flexible, but I often find the KF’s more efficient, especially once you learn to leverage that search box to quickly find just about anything on your device. So, points to the NT for flexibility in terms of user choice and design options, and points to the KF for a UI that is flexible in letting you hold the device however you want. You just have to be willing to work with the limited set of choices it gives you.

An audible difference

Speakers on either device are limited at best. I’m more concerned about how headphones sound, and I was surprised at how much better the KF sounded through headphones.  The volume range was greater, and bass response was noticeably better, which is key for a fan of electronica like me.  I think fans of classical music might prefer sound on the NT though, so if/when you do go to check out each device, be sure to bring a pair of your favorite headphones along to test them out if this is going to be important to you.

Which is better? Don’t listen to salespeople: see for yourself!

In the end I can’t confidently recommend one over the other. I think both companies should be proud of their efforts, and either one is a solid purchase for the money. I don’t think either one clearly is “the winner”, because individual preferences and usage patterns ultimately determine which is the better choice for you.

Do your research, go to stores to use each product, and IGNORE WHAT SALESPEOPLE SAY. I was at a Best Buy and overheard a salesman saying all sorts of wrong things about a Kindle Fire to someone, trying to steer him to a more expensive tablet.  Literally everything I heard him say about the KF was untrue. Every single sentence.

The B&N staff I encountered were friendly, and seemed fairly knowledgeable about the NT, but I wouldn’t try asking them to be fair about the KF in comparing it, that’s not their job. Their job is to sell you the NT, as it should be.

Read the reviews, take my ramblings for whatever their worth, then GO USE THEM. Pick them up, play with the UI, tell salespeople to leave you alone, and spend some time with each one. Try to see both on the same day, while impressions are fresh. Odds are good you’ll feel a pull towards one over the other, and THAT will be the right choice for you. After that, please just be respectful to people who made a different choice!

Please say hello

Feel free to ask questions in comments if you’d like, and if you use any B&N products then please ask for details to add me to your “nook friends” list, especially if you like SF, fantasy, and/or horror!

May whatever device you choose bring you many years of reading/viewing/gaming pleasure!

Posted by: Eddie | June 17, 2011

Interview with Karmapa Lama – Rediff.com News

 

 

 

 

Exclusive! Interview with Karmapa Lama – Rediff.com News.

This is an interesting interview with HH the 17th Karmapa.

Posted by: Eddie | May 29, 2011

Xinhua’s double standard

Xinhua has an article about some Chinese people’s concern that the animated movie “Kung Fu Panda” is out to “kidnap the minds” of Chinese people:

American “panda” movie stirs controversy among Chinese moviegoers.

They also have an article extolling how lovely all the modernization is they’re doing for Tibet:

Tibetan enjoy new lifestyle

It’s almost humorous to read one article on the damage that a silly cartoon movie can do to Chinese children and respect for their native culture, and then see another one completely whitewashing the cultural and physical violence the Chinese have inflicted on the Tibetan people. Oh, but a few of them have iPhones now, so that makes it all better.

Posted by: Eddie | April 18, 2011

Gay teen suicide rates higher in conservative areas

This article describes data that shows that gay teens growing up in less supportive and more conservative parts of the country are more likely to commit suicide. While sad it’s not necessarily surprising. What is a little more surprising is that the suicide for straight teens is *also* higher.

http://m.jezebel.com/5792950/gay-teen-suicide-rates-higher-in-conservative-areas

Posted by: Eddie | April 18, 2011

The hypocrisy of libertarians?

I was reading the Onion’s AV Club review of Atlas Shrugged, and afterwards was getting much entertainment out of reading the comments.  One slightly more serious comment by someone calling him/herself “Anti-libertarian” caught my attention:

Anti-Libertarian

16 APRIL 2011 | 3:26 PM CDT

I just want to say that I don’t give a shit what Libertarians claim to believe. When they consistently vote for the party that favors government control of private lives and military adventurism abroad, and that depends on the support of Christian-dominationists, it’s pretty obvious that they’re lying about every single one of their principles except for lowering taxes. Whether a hyperbolic criticism is “fair” to them is irrelevant, since they obviously don’t respect the rest of us enough to tell us that all they really care about is not paying taxes.

I’ve always found it rather odd that most Libertarians say how much they want government out of our lives yet, as this person alludes, consistently vote for the party that would so gleefully trash so many personal freedoms.  Should the particular yearning for low taxes truly trump concerns for freedom of choice, freedom from government-imposed religion, freedom to have sex with consenting adults regardless of gender, amongst others?

Even if I were someone who wanted smaller government and radically lower taxes (which I’m not), I would still think that these basic freedoms that far more affect personal freedom are more important than how much money you have would count for more.  Having a couple thousand more in my bank account at the end of each year won’t make up for DOMA or attempts to take away my female friends’ right to control what they do with their own bodies.

But, then again I suppose most Libertarians are white Christian heterosexual males who aren’t affected by many of these issues, so they don’t give a shit.  As the commenter mentioned, it really boils down to saving themselves some money and human rights be damned.

edit: added link to actual AV Club review and comments

Posted by: Eddie | March 31, 2011

Thunderbolt Traction

I’m really enjoying my HTC Thunderbolt so far.  What’s pleasantly surprising is that 3 coworkers I’ve shown it to have since gone out and got one for themselves.  The LTE speed is the main selling point, but people also seem impressed by the screen and how fast it operates in and of itself.

The other thing I’ve emphasized is how much flexibility they have with themes, skins, widgets, etc..  I’ve never seen a phone I have generate that much interest around me before.

Posted by: Eddie | March 29, 2011

Test of posting photo from my thunderbolt

 

As of this Sunday I now own both an iPad 2 (32gb/wifi/black) and Motorola Xoom (32gb+/wifi). I won’t delve into the gadget addiction that leads me to own 2 tablet devices, but suffice to say that I got a nice discount on the Xoom and recently received a decent bonus and raise from work.

There are plenty of formal reviews of each device out there, so I’ll assume readers have already seen the formal specs for each.  There are also plenty of comparisons (many seeming partisan to me), and I’m writing this comparison as someone who believes he is relatively agnostic when it comes to Android vs iOS.  I tend to “lean Android” in general, but think each approach has advantages and disadvantages when compared to the other.  This post will be a subjective “user experience” comparison between the two.

I’ve owned my iPad 2 since launch date, and have used it constantly since then. I’ve only had the Xoom two days. I used it almost all day Sunday, and showed both tablets off to several people at work today who expressed interest in one or both of them. After my experience with both has deepened I’ll have one or more follow-up posts on the current state of which I’m using most, but here is my initial assessment of each.  I’ll touch on topics in the order I experienced them as I used the tablets.

Look and Feel

The iPad 2 is noticeably sleeker, both to look at and in terms of width and weight. The Xoom has a solid, clean albeit plain appearance. The iPad 2 (I’ll just refer to it as the ‘iPad’ from here on) more immediately felt like a cutting edge product, and the Xoom did not have as strong a “wow I really am living in the 21st century after all” feel to it, at least at first.  Neither one would be comfortable to hold in one hand for long, and in most situations when you’ll have it propped on your lap, stomach, armrest, or whatever, the thickness and weight does not differ enough to be a critical advantage for either one.

The Display

Once again the iPad had more of an immediate “wow factor” to it. Its display is brighter, the colors are noticeably more vivid, and it retains that brightness better as you look at it from different angles.  Seen alone the Xoom’s display is still very good, but when first put next to each other there’s no denying the iPad makes a more positive first impression.

However, with a bit of exploration that advantage is lessened by a couple things. First, the Xoom’s auto brightness level is set to be dimmer than the iPad’s.  Going into its settings and adjusting the brightness shows that the Xoom’s display is more capable than you may initially have thought.  Further, using apps or viewing web pages that have small text reveals that while the Xoom’s screen resolution is not much higher, that difference is noticeable and sometimes important.

I’ve found the Xoom’s display clearly shines (no pun intended) when it comes to reading ebooks.  When using the Kindle app on each, especially with a small font selected, I (and everyone else I showed it to) had a clear preference for the Xoom’s display.  Text was noticeably crisper and easier to read on the Kindle app for the Xoom.  The clarity of small text on web pages seemed to vary more, with the iPad looking sharper in some cases, and the Xoom in others.  However, overall, the Xoom’s display extra resolution is noticeable.

Unfortunately the Xoom’s display is undermined by how reflective it is. Yes, it has sturdy Gorilla Glass for peace of mind, but it is much more prone to having glare from light sources above or behind you interfering with a clear view of it.

Each tablet’s screen size (the Xoom’s takes a more “widescreen” approach) will also affect your impression of it.  Certain web sites and apps fit more naturally into the Xoom’s wider form factor, and others seemed to work a better in the iPad’s.  Videos, on the other hand, seemed more at home with the Xoom’s screen ratio.

Anyone planning to read lots of ebooks or watch lots of videos should take a closer look at the Xoom, but those concentrating on web browsing, e-mail, and/or running apps that are not e-book or video related would most likely prefer the iPad’s display.

Basic Tablet Operations

The conventional wisdom is that Android is a “harder”, “more confusing” operating system.  It may not be quite as simplistically layed out as iOS, but unless you’re a technophobe unwilling to put 15 to 30 minutes into learning something, I can’t see how it could remotely be thought of as “confusing”.  It has a few core concepts that once understood make it as easy to use and appreciate as iOS.

Yes, Android has more options than iOS, but after a few minutes of use these options make sense, and are generally well laid out.  It is these extras that really make Android shine in comparison to iOS for me.  iOS’ simplicity is a strength for the non-technical: it does tend to behave more consistently, and apps seem in general to be better behaved in adhering to UI standards that keep things flowing smoothly without lots of need for “figuring things out” on the part of the user.

But, Android’s advantages are significant: first of all there are widgets.  On the iPad you live in a world of little squares. Each little square either represents an app, or a folder containing multiple apps. That’s it, end of story.  You want something that stretches for all or part of a row, or a larger square showing more info? Forget it.

On the other hand many Android apps also come with one or more widgets that can be placed in any one of your home screens. CNN has a widget that scrolls through top stories, either at a fixed rate or flips through stories at your touch. Music players can have VCR-like controls right on your screen to control your music. A view of your mailbox will let you quickly review new messages, or a widget of your day’s calendar could show you the day’s agenda and let you quickly scroll through it to see what’s up next.

The power of widgets is that you can access this sort of fundamental information at a glance without entering and exiting a variety of apps. Instead of going into my calendar to see my day’s schedule, then going into my e-mail to see what messages have arrived, then going into my news app to see top stories, etc., I can see it all layed out on my home screen in whatever arrangement I’d like and review it all at a glance without app-hopping.

Widgets show that the iPad, in contrast to its sharp, forward thinking physical appearance and design, can feel positively dated and outmoded in this respect.

Another area the iPad seriously lags is with notifications.  The iPad’s notifications consist of crude dialog boxes that always pop-up in the middle of your screen and you must immediately follow them to another app, or close and remember to follow-up on later.  Android, on the other hand, has an elegant notification bar in the lower right (in the case of Honeycomb) that accumulates all your notifications as they come in, with a series of small icons showing what awaits you.

You can quickly touch the notification area to see a list of all these notifications and either dismiss them, ignore them, or touch to follow them whenever you choose. You aren’t left making a choice between immediately interrupting whatever it is you’re doing at the moment or risking forgetting about the notification later on.

Like the iPad, the Xoom & Honeycomb allow you to have multiple screens full of icons (and widgets in the case of the Xoom.)  When placing icons, the Xoom has a much more sophisticated system that shows you all 5 screens in an overview, and lets you place multiple icons at once to one or more screens, or you can drop individual icons to your screen of choice.  If you drag & hold an icon/widget over a screen it zooms in to let you precisely place it if you wish, and then brings you back to the overview to place more icons/widgets.

As with widgets, the greater number of options may be a touch confusing at first, but the whole system works very well, and a few minutes of practice will make it second nature in no time.

In terms of scrolling, touch responsiveness, etc., the iPad had a slight advantage.  It was more common to see (slight) hitches and pauses while scrolling on the Xoom, while the iPad was usually buttery smooth.  On the other hand the greater operating memory of the Xoom made it quicker to switch between tasks, and less likely that you’d see the equivalent to the “page loading checkberboard pattern” that you’d see on the iPad if you too-hastily scrolled through web pages.

Overall, much as the physical beauty of the iPad makes a strong first impression, the greater flexibility and sophistication of Android’s approach makes a strong later impression as you dive into the capabilities of each device’s basic operations. I strongly prefer Honeycomb to iOS in terms of the options it provides.

Speed

Both devices zip along quite nicely.  I had no complaints about either one, with no clear advantage one way or the other.

Stability

In initial reviews the Xoom was knocked for being glitchy & unstable at times, something that was not apparent in my experience so far.  Perhaps a month’s worth of bug fixes has ironed the most egregious of those problems out, because I was quite comfortable with the Xoom’s reliability.  It wasn’t perfect, and some apps (e.g. Dolphin HD, an alternative browser) force-closed quite a bit, however that was the exception rather than the rule.

In my past month of using the iPad I regularly have apps suddenly close on me, and have to restart them. I wouldn’t say it happens frequently, but it also happens enough that I don’t feel particularly surprised when it does.

Overall the iPad is more stable, but the Xoom must have made some significant strides in the last few weeks because it’s working quite well in my experience so far, and the difference is negligible.

Battery Life

From reading most reviews I expected the Xoom to have good-but-not-great battery life. The iPad has superb battery life, and I was surprised that my first couple of days of heavy use of the Xoom has shown its battery life to be just as good as the iPad’s, when left on the (IMHO too dim) auto brightness. Bumping up its brightness to better levels has made it’s battery life nudge a little closer to the 8 hours or so most reviewers seem to be saying, but either device is fantastic when it comes to long lasting runtimes.  The iPad does still seem to have an edge to me, but in my experience so far it’s less than I expected after reading initial reviews.

App Selection

Everyone knows the App Store has many more apps than the Android Market. However, as Android’s share of the OS pie grows by leaps and bounds that gap is closing. In the world of cell phones the significance of this gap is not nearly as great as it used to be. It is now routine for most major apps to show up on both eventually, and it’s much less common to have something only come out for one or the other, it’s just a question of which it comes out first for, and when the next version will follow.

Android tablets on the other hand have a more significant gap.  The iPad’s one year advantage has lead to a much greater selection of tablet-optimized apps that dwarfs the handful out for the Xoom.  Anyone buying the Xoom has to make a leap of faith that Android tablets will gain enough of a foothold that developers will begin to release apps for it with greater frequency.

However, I’m disappointed that many reviews of the Xoom, and comparisons of Android tablets to the iPad overlook one significant fact: Android apps developed for cell phones are much more likely to scale well to a tablet than iOS apps.  The iPad can run apps written for iPods and iPhones, but the manner it does it is quite crude: you either see the app taking up a small centered area of the screen, or it is inflated to fill the screen, but usually that also means text and graphics  look fuzzy and unattractive.

On the other hand many Android apps seem to scale much more intelligently than their iOS kin. Perhaps this is one advantage of the much more greatly “fragmented” Android ecosphere: even basic apps have to be much more “device-aware”, and adjust accordingly to a wider-array of screen resolutions and so on. The Xoom and other Android tablets are just another resolution added to the mix.

For example, Verizon has an app that lets you view FiOS TV schedules and control your DVR from your Android phone. I installed and ran it on my Xoom, and it scaled up beautifully and worked well.  There’s one little part of the guide that doesn’t refresh properly when you scroll, but other than that the  app seems to work quite nicely for me. Other than that one minor glitch the designed-for-cell-phone Verizon app works as well on the Xoom as the iPad-specific version does for it.

So, while the Apple app store has an undeniable advantage when it comes to sheer volume of tablet-optimized apps, it’s not quite as dire as most comparisons would make you think. You’re still making a leap of faith with the Xoom, but even if you don’t see lots of tablet-optimized apps, you still have a good shot at having many Android phone-targeted apps work quite well on the Xoom.

Taking a step back and looking at app quality, I’d say most iPad apps have an advantage.  In a purely anecdotal and subjective perusal of a few news, music, and entertainment apps, the iPad apps generally felt more polished to me.  That’s not to say the Xoom’s apps were slouches, it’s just that the iPad apps tended to have smoother user experiences overall.  Once again, potential Xoom owners would have to take a leap of faith that Android app developers will grow in sophistication as they learn to take advantage of all that Honeycomb & Android tablets have to offer.

Summary

Showing the tablets to people at work confirmed the general consensus that people who are less tech-oriented, and want to use their tablet for a few clear, simple tasks such as web browsing, e-mail, etc. gravitated towards the iPad and said they’d prefer to get it instead of the Xoom.

My more technical friends who saw both appreciated the widgets, notification system, multi-tasking, and greater flexibility of Android as I did.  All of them said they would be hard pressed to choose between the two, as am I.

I think the iPad is a gorgeous device that deserves many of the superlatives Apple uses to describe it. I’ve been *very* happy with mine so far, it really is lovely.  On the other hand I’ve found the Xoom, in its current state, does not deserve much of the criticism it has received.  It provides stiff competition for the iPad 2.

If you find my write up skewing towards the Xoom, it’s because I feel I need to counter lots of the prevailing “wisdom” regarding it. My experience so far has been quite positive with it as well.  The iPad 2 is much more commonly written about, and in all but the most tablet-phobic or Android-centric fan sites seems to be assessed reasonably accurately.

Next Steps

I’ve spent the last month heavily using the iPad 2, and enjoying every minute of it.  I’m going to concentrate on using the Xoom extensively for the next month and see how it fares.  Of course right now I’m consistently reaching for the Xoom more, but I’ve only had it for a couple days so that’s natural. It will be interesting to see if I start chafing to get back to my iPad 2 after a couple weeks, or if it increasingly remains neglected in a corner while I continue happily using the Xoom more.  I’ll keep you posted!

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories